Skip to Main Content


Brooklyn College Library

SPCL 7912X: Social and Adaptive Behavior Assessment (McCabe and Julian): Syllabus

Social and Adaptive Behavior Assessment

Course Description

This course is a continuation of the assessment sequence, preceded by SPCL 7910 & 7911 (Cognitive Assessment I & II). This course involves the administration, scoring, and interpretation of personality, social and behavioral assessments given to individuals and groups. Representative projective techniques and objective behavioral assessments will be presented, critiqued, and administered. Research findings pertaining to the most commonly used personality procedures and their utility in the schools will be explored. Students will write assessment results into psychological reports.

Course Goals

This course will develop students’ skills in the administration, scoring, and interpretation of measures designed to assess strengths and needs of students in schools. The content of this course directly relates to the following school psychologist’s tasks: (1) assessment of students’ strengths and needs, particularly emotional or behavioral factors that may hinder academic success; (2) development of goals and interventions that facilitate cognitive, academic and emotional growth; and (3) consultation and collaboration with school personnel and families for enhancing development of students and improving emotional and psychological health and well-being.

Course Requirements

Students are required to keep up-to-date on class readings and assignments, and to be active participants in class discussions and activities. “Active” participation means that you engage in class discussions, ask questions, and offer relevant comments and ideas. Participation in BB Discussion Forum posts is required. Questions are a learning tool and are encouraged! Class participation allows the instructor to assess your competency in issues relating to test research and design, test administration and interpretation, and the corresponding ethical and legal standards and responsibilities. You are expected to attend all class sessions and arrive promptly. More than one unexplained absence and/or tardiness in either class or lab will affect course grade. Any anticipated absence must be approved beforehand by the instructor. You are welcome to ask the course instructor for feedback on your class participation grade mid-semester. Grading rubric is below.

Rubric for Evaluation of Participation & In-Class Contributions

 Points 9-10     

Consistent on-time attendance. Consistently raises or facilitates discussion with peers; engages in integrative and higher order thinking in relation to the readings (e.g., integrates two or more pieces of information in the readings, integrates experience with research discussion, poses hypotheticals, questions research. Weekly contributions to BB discussion forum.

 Points 7-8

Regular on-time attendance. Respectful attention to others’ contributions; periodically shares comments on at least one topic discussed in readings, and demonstrates understanding and relevance to group discussion; sometimes contributes to team-based discussions and interpretations. Biweekly contributions to BB discussion forum.

  Points 3-6

Present in class and attends and responds to others’ contributions at a personal level of experience, but shows no evidence of having read or thought about the topic; tends to observe more than participate in team-based discussions; may have more than one absence or lateness. Monthly contributions to BB discussion forum.

  Points 0-2

Makes no contribution to class discussion; unresponsive to or argumentative with others; repeatedly not present in class or late to class; phone use/browsing/texting during class; Infrequent or no contributions to BB discussion forum.

In order to become familiar with the major instruments and techniques of personality and behavioral assessment, and to refine your skills in communicating assessment information, you will need to submit scored protocols and written reports on the dates indicated below. Alternative measures will be discussed and at times distributed in class for your use. Reports will include sections on reason for referral, background information, behavioral observations, formal and informal test results, interpretation and analysis, and summary. You will need to recruit your own subjects for testing. Make sure the age of your child is appropriate for the age of the test materials required beforehand. Do not test any subjects over age 19. Test activities and related reports and scoring rubrics are outlined at the end of the syllabus. Attach a rubric form to submitted reports for grading purposes.

Note on subject recruitment:

  1. All examinees must be volunteers
  2. Written permission must be obtained. For minors (under age 18), their parent/guardian must consent and the minor must assent to testing
  3. Volunteers and/or their parents cannot be given assessment results
  4. All information must be kept confidential and you must maintain anonymity of the subject
  5. Any assessment data that appears alarming/critical should immediately be brought to the instructor’s attention
  6. The participant consent form (attached) must be signed and submitted with your report; missing consent forms will result in late penalties

Rubric for Evaluation of Participation & In-Class Contributions

 Points 9-10     

Consistent on-time attendance. Consistently raises or facilitates discussion with peers; engages in integrative and higher order thinking in relation to the readings (e.g., integrates two or more pieces of information in the readings, integrates experience with research discussion, poses hypotheticals, questions research. Weekly contributions to BB discussion forum.

 Points 7-8

Regular on-time attendance. Respectful attention to others’ contributions; periodically shares comments on at least one topic discussed in readings, and demonstrates understanding and relevance to group discussion; sometimes contributes to team-based discussions and interpretations. Biweekly contributions to BB discussion forum.

  Points 3-6

Present in class and attends and responds to others’ contributions at a personal level of experience, but shows no evidence of having read or thought about the topic; tends to observe more than participate in team-based discussions; may have more than one absence or lateness. Monthly contributions to BB discussion forum.

  Points 0-2

Makes no contribution to class discussion; unresponsive to or argumentative with others; repeatedly not present in class or late to class; phone use/browsing/texting during class; Infrequent or no contributions to BB discussion forum.

Select an assessment and present to your lab class of school psychology professionals.

  • This presentation should review the issues, controversies, and current empirical status of a particular assessment.
  • The procedures for administering the test should be briefly reviewed.
  • Include information on standardization, reliability and validity, cultural-fairness, and strengths and limitations of the assessment device when appropriate.
  • How directly does this instrument/technique contribute to our understanding of individual children? 
  • How helpful is this device/technique in determining the programming needs of the particular child? 
  • We are particularly interested in hearing how well the assessment is culturally and linguistically-fair.

Be sure to conduct a full literature review to identify studies using your instrument/assessment domain, and critically review this literature in your presentation.

  • It is particularly important that you identify studies that validate the instrument that are NOT conducted by the instrument’s authors (thus providing independent validity of the instrument’s utility). You are not allowed to use the test manuals because of this.
  • The research presented must be external research.
  • You can include research conducted on early versions/revisions of the assessment.
  • Conclude your presentation with your own opinion/analysis and discussion of future directions.
  • Each workshop is time-limited to 30 minutes and topics are available on a first-come basis (no duplicate topics). Workshops will be conducted during lab class. Remember that it is always more fun and effective to utilize some hands-on or interactive activities to get your audience involved in the topic. Your classmates and the instructor will complete an evaluation rubric (https://forms.gle/CUByZUZNWgyheWjm7) to provide feedback on your talk.
  • On your presentation date, upload your PowerPoint or PDF of your presentation to the BB discussion forum.
  • You will be able to access everyone’s presentations this way, so you can create your own assessment reference library.

In choosing an assessment topic, be sure to check out the assessments we have online access to (see links below) so you can include a sample report. Possible topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Beck Youth Inventories
  • Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist
  • Social Responsiveness Scale-2        
  • School Motivation and Learning Strategies Inventory
  • Child Depression Inventory
  • BRIEF-2
  • Piers-Harris Self-Concept Scale-3                           
  • ADOS autism assessment       
  • RCDS-2/RADS-2                            
  • Burks Behavior Rating Scale-2
  • Adolescent Psychopathology Scale
  • Self-Directed Search 5
  • Brown Executive Function/Attention Scales
  • Sensory Processing Measure
  • Jesness Inventory Revised
  • State Trait Anxiety Inventory
  • Anger Regulation and Expression Scale
  • Millon Adolescent Inventories
  • Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (ASRS)
  • PAI-A
  • Temperament and Atypical Behavior scale
  • Gilliam Autism Rating Scale-3
  • Childhood Autism Rating Scales-2
  • Social Skills Improvement System (SSIS/SSRS)
  • Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children-2
  • Revised Children Manifest Anxiety Scale-2
  • PDD Behavior Inventory
  • Social Emotional Assets and Resilience Scales (SEARS)
  • Trauma Symptoms Checklist
  • NEO-PI-3

School psychologists have an ethical responsibility to engage in social justice and anti-racist action. They recognize biased practice and actively advocate for culturally-responsive and equitable assessment and diagnostic approaches. To this end, students will research and present one journal article, conference or workshop on equity, cultural fairness, and/or racial bias in the domain of personality, social, or behavior assessment, as well as the diagnosis and/or disproportionality in special education classification and intervention.

Your presentation may also include established (or emerging) practices in assessment that reduce bias. Students will also post the article/workshop on Blackboard's Discussion forum with a brief summary and analysis. Students are required to comment on other posts with additional insights and resources. The purpose of this assignment is to engage in active dialogue and self-examination - hence, students are encouraged to post thoughtful commentary and refrain from summarizing the articles or others' comments. Personal reflections and insights are particularly welcome.

Final exam will cover readings, handouts, and lecture materials.

Classroom Decorum

The following rules are intended to improve the quality of the classroom and enhance learning for all. These are expectations to be adhered to in every class:

  1. Ensure that you have a quiet, distraction-free learning space as much as possible. Your Wi-Fi signal should be strong and your technology in good working order. Invest in good quality headphones and microphone if needed so you can hear and speak clearly in your classes. Check that your webcam quality is sufficient to be clearly visible to your professor and classmates. Class participation is an important aspect of your classes in the online format. Please refrain from using distracting technology (i.e., texting, surfing the web, etc) during class.
  2. When using email to contact the professor, use a professional writing style. Use an appropriate salutation, valediction, and signature line. Your email is considered professional communication. Be particularly mindful when writing emails on your phone!
  3. Please come to class prepared by completing assigned reading, arriving on time, and following class discussions attentively. Asking questions on topics that were already asked or discussed in the readings wastes valuable class time. School psychologists are expected to investigate tests and administration procedures before using any test(s), and that expectation is upheld in this class. Any questions presented in class should follow appropriate steps on your behalf to solve the problem beforehand, either by referencing the manual, textbooks, asking a peer, or attending to class lectures.

Grades and Evaluation

  1. Class participation: 10%
  2. Equity article presentation and BB discussion forum: 5%
  3. In-service workshop: 15%
  4. Report: Report 1 10%
  5. Reports: 2, 3 & 4 (15% each) 45% (total)  
  6. Final Examination: 15%

Policy on Late Submissions/Incompletes

Work submitted late will be marked down accordingly by the discretion of the instructor. All assignments are due on the dates indicated on the course calendar.  If there are extenuating circumstances which prevent you from submitting work on time, you must clear this with the instructor prior to the class in which work is submitted.  In all other cases, grades will be lowered on overdue work. Grades on reports and assignments will be lowered 5 points (on a 50 point scale) per week late, as measured by the beginning of the class period in which the assignment was due. There is no make-up final exam. Assignments not submitted on the due date with no advance notice to the instructor will be marked as a zero.

Brooklyn College Faculty Council has determined the following policy for Incomplete Grades:

A grade of Incomplete (INC) may be given at the discretion of the instructor when 1) a student has satisfactorily completed most, but not all, course requirements, and 2) a student provides to the instructor evidence documenting the extenuating circumstances that prevent the completion of course requirements by the end of the semester.

It is important to note that grades of INC can only be given if the instructor decides the grade is appropriate given the unusual extenuating circumstances documented by the student. Final assignments not submitted on the due date are given a grade of zero.

Learning Objectives

Students completing this course will be able to:

  1. Demonstrate knowledge of administration and interpretation of story-telling techniques (Domain 1). Assessed: Reports: 1, 2, & 4
  2. Demonstrate knowledge of administration and interpretation of drawing techniques (Domain 1). Assessed: Reports: 2, 3 & 4
  3. Demonstrate ability to administer and interpret self-report and other-report behavior and personality forms (Domain 1). Assessed: Reports: 3 & 4
  4. Demonstrate the ability to integrate personality assessment instruments as well as informal assessment procedures and ecological assessments (Domains 1, 4, 6, 8). Assessed: Reports: 2, 3, & 4 5
  5. Use data-based decision to create achievement goals and objectives (Domains 1, 4). Assessed: All assignments
  6. Demonstrate reflection of the influence of diversity and cultural fairness on assessment (Domain 8). Assessed: All assignments
  7. Accept critical feedback on report writing skills and employ critical self-reflection in subsequent assignments (Domains 1, 4, 10). Assessed: All assignments
  8. Demonstrate an understanding of test construction, bias, reliability, validity, and various forms of data collection methods (Domains 8, 9, 10) Assessed: All assignments
  9. Demonstrate an understanding of social justice, historically marginalized groups, and ethical and legal professional practice as reflected in test analysis, report writing and diagnosis and classification (Domains 1, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10). Assessed: All assignments

Course and CUNY Policies

The Center for Student Disability Services is working remotely at this time.  Please email them at testingcsds@brooklyn.cuny.edu for assistance.

Students should inform the professor if they have a disability or any other situation that may require Section 504/ADA accommodations.  The faculty and staff will attempt to work out whatever arrangements are necessary.

Please provide me with your course accommodation form and discuss your specific accommodation with me as soon as possible to ensure accommodations are met in a timely fashion.

In order to receive academic accommodations students must first be registered with the Center for Student Disability Services. Students who have a documented disability or who suspect that they might have a disability are invited to set up an appointment with the Director of the Center for Student Disability Services, Ms. Valerie Stewart-Lovell or the Assistant Director, Josephine Patterson or their general email testingcsds@brooklyn.cuny.edu

Academic dishonesty of any type, including cheating and plagiarism, is unacceptable at Brooklyn College. Cheating is any misrepresentation in academic work. Plagiarism is the representation of another person’s work, words, or ideas as your own. Students should consult the Brooklyn College Student Handbook for a fuller, more specific discussion of related academic integrity standards.

Academic dishonesty is punishable by failure of the “…test, examination, term paper or other assignment on which cheating occurred” (Faculty Council, May 18, 1954).

In addition, disciplinary proceedings in cases of academic dishonesty may result in penalties of admonition, warning, censure, disciplinary probation, restitution, suspension, expulsion, complaint to civil authorities, or ejection (Adopted by Policy Council, May 8, 1991).

NOTE: If you have a question about how to cite correctly ask your teacher BEFORE submitting your work.

  • The faculty and administration of Brooklyn College support an environment free from cheating and plagiarism.
  • Each student is responsible for being aware of what constitutes cheating and plagiarism and for avoiding both.
  • View complete text of CUNY Academic Integrity Policy and Brooklyn College procedure for policy implementation.
  • If a faculty member suspects a violation of academic integrity and, upon investigation, confirms that violation, or if the student admits the violation, the faculty member must report the violation.
  • Please read the section entitled “Academic Regulations and Procedures” in the Brooklyn College Undergraduate Bulletin or Graduate Bulletin for a complete listing of academic regulations of the College.

Bereavement Policy:

  • Students who experience the death of a loved one must contact the Division of Student Affairs, 2113 Boylan Hall, if they wish to implement either the Standard Bereavement Procedure or the Leave of Absence Bereavement Procedure. The Division of Student Affairs has the right to request a document that verifies the death (e.g., a funeral program or death notice). Contact Email: studentaffairs@brooklyn.cuny.edu
  • Typically, this death involves that of a family member, in parallel to the bereavement policy for faculty and staff. However, it is up to the discretion of the Division of Student Affairs to determine if a death outside of the immediate family warrants implementation of the student bereavement policy.
  •  As an option, and in consultation with the Division of Student Affairs, students may take the Leave of Absence Bereavement after the Standard Bereavement.
  • Reference to the Student Bereavement Policies will be noted on course syllabi.
  • Students requesting a religious accommodation should contact the Division of Student Affairs as well. The chief student affairs officer, or a designee, and the student will engage in an interactive process with the goal of finding an acceptable accommodation.

Bereavement Procedure:

  • Upon approval from the Division of Student Affairs, the student is allowed one week, commencing from the day of notification to the Division of Student Affairs, of excused absence.
  • Should the student feel that he/she needs additional days, these should be discussed with individual course instructors and/or the Division of Student Affairs.
  • The Division of Student Affairs will contact the student’s faculty and academic staff of the student’s courses.
  • Faculty and academic staff will be advised that extensions must be granted to the student for the period of one week of excused absence.
  • Further extensions may be negotiated with the student when he or she returns to campus.
  • Students are encouraged to discuss options with their instructors.

Leave of Absence Bereavement Procedure:

  • Students may be allowed to withdraw from the semester in which the death occurs.
  • The Bereavement Leave of Absence is for one semester only.
  • Students who have opted to take the Bereavement Leave of Absence and have already attended classes for the semester of the leave will be allowed to re-enter the following semester without having to reapply to the college.
  • Students who wish to take the leave of absence prior to the beginning of the semester will be required to reapply for the following semester.
  • Students who are in good academic standing will be given the opportunity to successfully complete the credits for the semester in which they return.
  • Students will consult with the Division of Student Affairs, on a case-by-case basis, as to whether they should withdraw from their courses during this leave of absence or to request incompletes from the faculty member.
  •  Given that there may be a potential impact on financial aid, students who receive financial aid and who take the Bereavement Leave of Absence, upon arrangement with the Division of Student Affairs, will meet with a financial aid adviser prior to taking this option.
  • The New York State Education Law provides that no student shall be expelled or refused admission to an institution of higher education because he or she is unable to attend classes or participate in examinations or study or work requirements on any particular day or days because of religious beliefs.
  • Students who are unable to attend classes on a particular day or days because of religious beliefs will be excused from any examination or study or work requirements.
  • Faculty must make good-faith efforts to provide students absent from class because of religious beliefs equivalent opportunities to make up the work missed; no additional fees may be charged for this consideration.
  • If classes, examinations, or study or work requirements occur on Friday after 4 p.m. or on Saturday, similar or makeup classes, examinations, or study or work requirements will be made available on other days, where possible and practical.
  • The faculty and the administration will not allow any adverse or prejudicial effects to accrue to students availing themselves of this regulation.
  • If students have complaints about the application of this policy, they are entitled to bring action or a proceeding for enforcement of their rights in the Supreme Court of Kings County

Conceptual Framework Theme Addressed By This Course

This course addresses the four areas described in the Brooklyn College School of Education’s conceptual Framework as follows:

  • Collaboration: School psychologist candidates access the knowledge and understandings of other professionals, students, and families to obtain data that focus on the strengths and needs of students. Through the readings, class discussions, and assignments, school psychologist candidates are prepared to involve themselves in students’ lives by collaborating with families, teachers, administrators, and other support staff.
  • Critical Self-Reflection and Reflective Practice: School psychologist candidates are expected to critically reflect on readings, class discussions and class assignments. Over the course of the semester, students will reflect on their own assumptions about their practices, the students and families with whom they will work, the communities in which they will work, and their own development as professionals.
  • Social Justice: Over the course of the semester, the school psychologist candidates develop a deeper understanding of the quest for social justice. By understanding the emotional and academic life of children, they can be caring advocates and change agents for all students and their families in pursuit of academic excellence and social equality.
  • Diversity: School psychologist candidates demonstrate a capacity to understand students’ cultures and families and use this information as a basis for connecting professional practices to students’ experiences.

National Association of School Psychologists (NASP) Domains of Practice Addressed by This Course

This course addresses a number of Domains of Practice set forth by NASP, as follows:

  • Data-Based Decision-Making (Domain 1): School psychologists understand and utilize assessment methods for identifying strengths and needs; developing effective interventions, services, and programs; and measuring progress and outcomes within a multitiered system of supports. School psychologists use a problem-solving framework as the basis for all professional activities. School psychologists systematically collect data from multiple sources as a foundation for decision-making at the individual, group, and systems levels, and they consider ecological factors (e.g., classroom, family, and community characteristics) as a context for assessment and intervention.
  • Mental and Behavioral Health Services and Interventions (Domain 4).  School psychologists understand the biological, cultural, developmental, and social influences on mental and behavioral health, behavioral and emotional impacts on learning, and evidence-based strategies to promote social–emotional functioning. School psychologists, in collaboration with others, design, implement, and evaluate services that promote resilience and positive behavior, support socialization and adaptive skills, and enhance mental and behavioral health.
  • Services to Promote Safe and Supportive Schools (Domain 6). School psychologists understand principles and research related to social–emotional well-being, resilience and risk factors in learning, mental and behavioral health, services in schools and communities to support multitiered prevention and health promotion, and evidence-based strategies for creating safe and supportive schools. School psychologists, in collaboration with others, promote preventive and responsive services that enhance learning, mental and behavioral health, and psychological and physical safety and implement effective crisis prevention, protection, mitigation, response, and recovery.
  • Family, School and Community Collaboration. (Domain 7). School psychologists understand principles and research related to family systems, strengths, needs, and cultures; evidence-based strategies to support positive family influences on children’s learning and mental health; and strategies to develop collaboration between families and schools. School psychologists, in collaboration with others, design, implement, and evaluate services that respond to culture and context. They facilitate family and school partnerships and interactions with community agencies to enhance academic and social–behavioral outcomes for children.
  • Equitable Practices for Diverse Student Populations (Standard 8): School psychologists have knowledge of individual differences, abilities, disabilities, and other diverse characteristics and the impact they have on development and learning. They also understand principles and research related to diversity in children, families, schools, and communities, including factors related to child development, religion, culture and cultural identity, race, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, socioeconomic status, and other variables. School psychologists implement evidence-based strategies to enhance services in both general and special education and address potential influences related to diversity. School psychologists demonstrate skills to provide professional services that promote effective functioning for individuals, families, and schools with diverse characteristics, cultures, and backgrounds through an ecological lens across multiple contexts. School psychologists recognize that equitable practices for diverse student populations, respect for diversity in development and learning, and advocacy for social justice are foundational to effective service delivery. While equality ensures that all children have the same access to general and special educational opportunities, equity ensures that each student receives what they need to benefit from these opportunities.
  • Research and Evidence-Based Practice (Domain 9): School psychologists have knowledge of research design, statistics, measurement, and varied data collection and analysis techniques sufficient for understanding research, interpreting data, and evaluating programs in applied settings. As scientist practitioners, school psychologists evaluate and apply research as a foundation for service delivery and, in collaboration with others, use various techniques and technology resources for data collection, measurement, and analysis to support effective practices at the individual, group, and/or systems levels.
  • Legal, Ethical, and Professional Practice (Domain 10): School psychologists have knowledge of the history and foundations of school psychology; multiple service models and methods; ethical, legal, and professional standards; and other factors related to professional identity and effective practice as school psychologists. School psychologists provide services consistent with ethical, legal, and professional standards; engage in responsive ethical and professional decision-making; collaborate with other professionals; and apply professional work characteristics needed for effective practice as school psychologists, including effective interpersonal skills, responsibility, adaptability, initiative, dependability, technological competence, advocacy skills, respect for human diversity, and a commitment to social justice and equity.

Program Mission Statement Addressed by This Course

The content of this course as well as methodologies used are consistent with the mission of the School Psychologist Graduate Program. The mission statement of the Program is as follows: “The Brooklyn College School Psychologist Graduate Program strives to address our urban community’s need for highly competent, self-reflective, and compassionate school psychologists who strive to improve the educational experiences and mental health of children in our schools.”

School of Education Mission Statement

The School of Education at Brooklyn College prepares teachers, administrators, counselors, and school psychologists to serve, lead and thrive in the schools and agencies of t11his city and beyond. Through collaborative action, teaching and research, we develop our students' capacities to create socially just, intellectually vital, aesthetically rich and compassionate communities that value equity and excellence, access and rigor. We design our programs in cooperation with Liberal Arts and Sciences faculties and in consultation with local schools in order to provide our students with the opportunity to develop the knowledge, proficiencies and understandings needed to work with New York City's racially, ethnically and linguistically diverse populations. We believe that teaching is an art that incorporates critical self-reflection, openness to new ideas, practices and technologies, and that focuses on the individual learner's needs and promotes growth. Our collective work is shaped by scholarship and is animated by a commitment to educate our students to the highest standards of professional competence.