This course is a continuation of the assessment sequence, preceded by SPCL 7910 & 7911 (Cognitive Assessment I & II). This course involves the administration, scoring, and interpretation of personality, social and behavioral assessments given to individuals and groups. Representative projective techniques and objective behavioral assessments will be presented, critiqued, and administered. Research findings pertaining to the most commonly used personality procedures and their utility in the schools will be explored. Students will write assessment results into psychological reports.
This course will develop students’ skills in the administration, scoring, and interpretation of measures designed to assess strengths and needs of students in schools. The content of this course directly relates to the following school psychologist’s tasks: (1) assessment of students’ strengths and needs, particularly emotional or behavioral factors that may hinder academic success; (2) development of goals and interventions that facilitate cognitive, academic and emotional growth; and (3) consultation and collaboration with school personnel and families for enhancing development of students and improving emotional and psychological health and well-being.
Students are required to keep up-to-date on class readings and assignments, and to be active participants in class discussions and activities. “Active” participation means that you engage in class discussions, ask questions, and offer relevant comments and ideas. Participation in BB Discussion Forum posts is required. Questions are a learning tool and are encouraged! Class participation allows the instructor to assess your competency in issues relating to test research and design, test administration and interpretation, and the corresponding ethical and legal standards and responsibilities. You are expected to attend all class sessions and arrive promptly. More than one unexplained absence and/or tardiness in either class or lab will affect course grade. Any anticipated absence must be approved beforehand by the instructor. You are welcome to ask the course instructor for feedback on your class participation grade mid-semester. Grading rubric is below.
Rubric for Evaluation of Participation & In-Class Contributions
Points 9-10
Consistent on-time attendance. Consistently raises or facilitates discussion with peers; engages in integrative and higher order thinking in relation to the readings (e.g., integrates two or more pieces of information in the readings, integrates experience with research discussion, poses hypotheticals, questions research. Weekly contributions to BB discussion forum.
Points 7-8
Regular on-time attendance. Respectful attention to others’ contributions; periodically shares comments on at least one topic discussed in readings, and demonstrates understanding and relevance to group discussion; sometimes contributes to team-based discussions and interpretations. Biweekly contributions to BB discussion forum.
Points 3-6
Present in class and attends and responds to others’ contributions at a personal level of experience, but shows no evidence of having read or thought about the topic; tends to observe more than participate in team-based discussions; may have more than one absence or lateness. Monthly contributions to BB discussion forum.
Points 0-2
Makes no contribution to class discussion; unresponsive to or argumentative with others; repeatedly not present in class or late to class; phone use/browsing/texting during class; Infrequent or no contributions to BB discussion forum.
In order to become familiar with the major instruments and techniques of personality and behavioral assessment, and to refine your skills in communicating assessment information, you will need to submit scored protocols and written reports on the dates indicated below. Alternative measures will be discussed and at times distributed in class for your use. Reports will include sections on reason for referral, background information, behavioral observations, formal and informal test results, interpretation and analysis, and summary. You will need to recruit your own subjects for testing. Make sure the age of your child is appropriate for the age of the test materials required beforehand. Do not test any subjects over age 19. Test activities and related reports and scoring rubrics are outlined at the end of the syllabus. Attach a rubric form to submitted reports for grading purposes.
Note on subject recruitment:
Rubric for Evaluation of Participation & In-Class Contributions
Points 9-10
Consistent on-time attendance. Consistently raises or facilitates discussion with peers; engages in integrative and higher order thinking in relation to the readings (e.g., integrates two or more pieces of information in the readings, integrates experience with research discussion, poses hypotheticals, questions research. Weekly contributions to BB discussion forum.
Points 7-8
Regular on-time attendance. Respectful attention to others’ contributions; periodically shares comments on at least one topic discussed in readings, and demonstrates understanding and relevance to group discussion; sometimes contributes to team-based discussions and interpretations. Biweekly contributions to BB discussion forum.
Points 3-6
Present in class and attends and responds to others’ contributions at a personal level of experience, but shows no evidence of having read or thought about the topic; tends to observe more than participate in team-based discussions; may have more than one absence or lateness. Monthly contributions to BB discussion forum.
Points 0-2
Makes no contribution to class discussion; unresponsive to or argumentative with others; repeatedly not present in class or late to class; phone use/browsing/texting during class; Infrequent or no contributions to BB discussion forum.
Select an assessment and present to your lab class of school psychology professionals.
Be sure to conduct a full literature review to identify studies using your instrument/assessment domain, and critically review this literature in your presentation.
In choosing an assessment topic, be sure to check out the assessments we have online access to (see links below) so you can include a sample report. Possible topics include, but are not limited to, the following:
School psychologists have an ethical responsibility to engage in social justice and anti-racist action. They recognize biased practice and actively advocate for culturally-responsive and equitable assessment and diagnostic approaches. To this end, students will research and present one journal article, conference or workshop on equity, cultural fairness, and/or racial bias in the domain of personality, social, or behavior assessment, as well as the diagnosis and/or disproportionality in special education classification and intervention.
Your presentation may also include established (or emerging) practices in assessment that reduce bias. Students will also post the article/workshop on Blackboard's Discussion forum with a brief summary and analysis. Students are required to comment on other posts with additional insights and resources. The purpose of this assignment is to engage in active dialogue and self-examination - hence, students are encouraged to post thoughtful commentary and refrain from summarizing the articles or others' comments. Personal reflections and insights are particularly welcome.
Final exam will cover readings, handouts, and lecture materials.
The following rules are intended to improve the quality of the classroom and enhance learning for all. These are expectations to be adhered to in every class:
Policy on Late Submissions/Incompletes
Work submitted late will be marked down accordingly by the discretion of the instructor. All assignments are due on the dates indicated on the course calendar. If there are extenuating circumstances which prevent you from submitting work on time, you must clear this with the instructor prior to the class in which work is submitted. In all other cases, grades will be lowered on overdue work. Grades on reports and assignments will be lowered 5 points (on a 50 point scale) per week late, as measured by the beginning of the class period in which the assignment was due. There is no make-up final exam. Assignments not submitted on the due date with no advance notice to the instructor will be marked as a zero.
Brooklyn College Faculty Council has determined the following policy for Incomplete Grades:
A grade of Incomplete (INC) may be given at the discretion of the instructor when 1) a student has satisfactorily completed most, but not all, course requirements, and 2) a student provides to the instructor evidence documenting the extenuating circumstances that prevent the completion of course requirements by the end of the semester.
It is important to note that grades of INC can only be given if the instructor decides the grade is appropriate given the unusual extenuating circumstances documented by the student. Final assignments not submitted on the due date are given a grade of zero.
Students completing this course will be able to:
The Center for Student Disability Services is working remotely at this time. Please email them at testingcsds@brooklyn.cuny.edu for assistance.
Students should inform the professor if they have a disability or any other situation that may require Section 504/ADA accommodations. The faculty and staff will attempt to work out whatever arrangements are necessary.
Please provide me with your course accommodation form and discuss your specific accommodation with me as soon as possible to ensure accommodations are met in a timely fashion.
In order to receive academic accommodations students must first be registered with the Center for Student Disability Services. Students who have a documented disability or who suspect that they might have a disability are invited to set up an appointment with the Director of the Center for Student Disability Services, Ms. Valerie Stewart-Lovell or the Assistant Director, Josephine Patterson or their general email testingcsds@brooklyn.cuny.edu
Academic dishonesty of any type, including cheating and plagiarism, is unacceptable at Brooklyn College. Cheating is any misrepresentation in academic work. Plagiarism is the representation of another person’s work, words, or ideas as your own. Students should consult the Brooklyn College Student Handbook for a fuller, more specific discussion of related academic integrity standards.
Academic dishonesty is punishable by failure of the “…test, examination, term paper or other assignment on which cheating occurred” (Faculty Council, May 18, 1954).
In addition, disciplinary proceedings in cases of academic dishonesty may result in penalties of admonition, warning, censure, disciplinary probation, restitution, suspension, expulsion, complaint to civil authorities, or ejection (Adopted by Policy Council, May 8, 1991).
NOTE: If you have a question about how to cite correctly ask your teacher BEFORE submitting your work.
This course addresses the four areas described in the Brooklyn College School of Education’s conceptual Framework as follows:
This course addresses a number of Domains of Practice set forth by NASP, as follows:
The content of this course as well as methodologies used are consistent with the mission of the School Psychologist Graduate Program. The mission statement of the Program is as follows: “The Brooklyn College School Psychologist Graduate Program strives to address our urban community’s need for highly competent, self-reflective, and compassionate school psychologists who strive to improve the educational experiences and mental health of children in our schools.”
The School of Education at Brooklyn College prepares teachers, administrators, counselors, and school psychologists to serve, lead and thrive in the schools and agencies of t11his city and beyond. Through collaborative action, teaching and research, we develop our students' capacities to create socially just, intellectually vital, aesthetically rich and compassionate communities that value equity and excellence, access and rigor. We design our programs in cooperation with Liberal Arts and Sciences faculties and in consultation with local schools in order to provide our students with the opportunity to develop the knowledge, proficiencies and understandings needed to work with New York City's racially, ethnically and linguistically diverse populations. We believe that teaching is an art that incorporates critical self-reflection, openness to new ideas, practices and technologies, and that focuses on the individual learner's needs and promotes growth. Our collective work is shaped by scholarship and is animated by a commitment to educate our students to the highest standards of professional competence.